Tonight at midnight the final Harry Potter movie will be released in theaters. I don't know how to feel about this. My emotions are incredibly mixed I'm very excited to see the last movie and to see how the directors decided to film the end but at the same time I will never look forward to a series of movies as much as I have looked forward to the Harry Potter movies. It was similar when the book series ended, the only consolation was knowing that there would still be movies. Now the movies will have ended and all of the people who didn't go through the trouble of reading the books, which they should still read because they are awesome, will find out if the boy who lived, dies. As long as they haven't figured out the ending already, I'm not going to spoil it here but I really do like the ending and I think it is a great finale for this ride so many people have taken. I remember reading the first book in fifth grade, Mrs. Diedrich read it out loud to the class which really is not as good as reading it yourself and putting your own imaginative twist on the characters. Never-the-less I was 11 when I met Harry, Ron, Hermione and the rest of the Hogwarts crew. I can remember looking forward to when the book would come out and I could read it as fast as possible. I later realized when I read the books for the second time that I couldn't remember half of the details of the story because I read it so fast the first time! So this movie will be incredibly bitter sweet, and I'll probably cry. My family has had a tradition of going to the movies together so this year it will be the same. As tempted as I am to sneak out of my house with my wire rimmed glasses and an eye liner lightning bolt scar drawn on my forehead, I will refrain but will most likely have to go at our family pool party next weekend. Also I will like vicariously through my roommate who is probably waiting in line right now with her dad. I hope you are going to the movie tonight or see it soon and end Harry's journey with the rest of the world :)
Alex
Thursday, July 14, 2011
Tuesday, July 5, 2011
Guilty or Not Guilty...
Today the verdict for the Casey Anthony trial was given... not guilty of first- degree murder, aggravated child- abuse, and aggravated manslaughter of a child. But guilty of four counts of providing false information to law enforcement which could result in a maximum of 4 years in prison, 3 of which she has already served. I know my opinion does not matter at all in this case and I was not on the jury but I can't help but feel this trial is going to be compared to the O.J. Simpson trial. This case was extremely publicized by the media who I admit may have influenced my thoughts on Casey Anthony but I won't ever know the extent to which the media may have influenced many to believe Casey Anthony is a murderer. I understand that even though common sense made me believe that she killed her little girl, there was very little factual, concrete evidence against her. I keep hearing the word circumstantial, used to describe the evidence that was used. I can maybe understand the not guilty verdict on the first degree murder charge but wrapping my head around the aggravated child abuse not guilty verdict is what is puzzling me. Not reporting your 2 year old daughter missing for 31 days, to me, qualifies as child abuse. Even though she was not alive during those 31 days, if Casey Anthony is not guilty as the jury has decided on, she was not aware of her child's death and therefore extremely neglected the well-being of her child!? I don't even know what to say, I feel she deserves more than just lying to an officer. Why would she need to lie to an officer is she did nothing wrong? Why was she out partying days after Caylee went missing? Why did she not tell someone her daughter was missing if she did not harm her? And most of all why did this little girl die at the young age of 2?
With all of the verdicts put aside, I think Casey Anthony just got away with murdering her daughter and is as guilty as the man who her trial will be compared to. This also leads me to question the United States Judicial system. I'm no expert with the government but I try to stay informed, how the court system works baffles me. I also would have no problem if someone tried to explain things to me but I really don't know who to ask and if someone did tell me I am not entirely sure I would believe them anyway, but if anyone wants to inform me, let me know! Why are some cases determined by a jury and others determined by the judge? And who thought it was a good idea to have a jury of our peers when it takes only 1 person to have a hung jury and a lot of people aren't knowledgeable with scientific information who could royally screw up a case? I actually recently heard that it takes 2 people to have a hung jury because normally 1 person doesn't have the guts to stand up to the rest of the jury, but when there is 2 the person has someone to back them up.
Just looked up what aggravated child abuse is defined as in Florida:
(a) Intentional infliction of physical or mental injury upon a child;
(b) An intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child; or
(c) Active encouragement of any person to commit an act that results or could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child.
A person who knowingly or willfully abuses a child without causing great bodily harm, permanent disability, or permanent disfigurement to the child commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(2) "Aggravated child abuse" occurs when a person:
(a) Commits aggravated battery on a child;
(b) Willfully tortures, maliciously punishes, or willfully and unlawfully cages a child; or
(c) Knowingly or willfully abuses a child and in so doing causes great bodily harm, permanent disability, or permanent disfigurement to the child.
So from reading that description, since they found her not guilty of murder I would only assume they couldn't find her guilty of child abuse? I also looked up the definition of child neglect in Florida:
1. A caregiver's failure or omission to provide a child with the care, supervision, and services necessary to maintain the child's physical and mental health, including, but not limited to, food, nutrition, clothing, shelter, supervision, medicine, and medical services that a prudent person would consider essential for the well-being of the child; or
2. A caregiver's failure to make a reasonable effort to protect a child from abuse, neglect, or exploitation by another person.
(a) Neglect of a child may be based on repeated conduct or on a single incident or omission that results in, or could reasonably be expected to result in, serious physical or mental injury, or a substantial risk of death, to a child.
(b) A person who willfully or by culpable negligence neglects a child and in so doing causes great bodily harm, permanent disability, or permanent disfigurement to the child commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(c) A person who willfully or by culpable negligence neglects a child without causing great bodily harm, permanent disability, or permanent disfigurement to the child commits a felony of the third
degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
So could she be charged with neglect? It's a different charge then abuse correct? If anyone has any comments regarding this situation or could provide some insight into the judicial system and why things happen the way they do I would greatly appreciate it so leave me a comment!!
-It's really important to remember that a little girl was taken way to soon from this earth and that the Anthony family... guilty or not... will forever be changed.
Alex
With all of the verdicts put aside, I think Casey Anthony just got away with murdering her daughter and is as guilty as the man who her trial will be compared to. This also leads me to question the United States Judicial system. I'm no expert with the government but I try to stay informed, how the court system works baffles me. I also would have no problem if someone tried to explain things to me but I really don't know who to ask and if someone did tell me I am not entirely sure I would believe them anyway, but if anyone wants to inform me, let me know! Why are some cases determined by a jury and others determined by the judge? And who thought it was a good idea to have a jury of our peers when it takes only 1 person to have a hung jury and a lot of people aren't knowledgeable with scientific information who could royally screw up a case? I actually recently heard that it takes 2 people to have a hung jury because normally 1 person doesn't have the guts to stand up to the rest of the jury, but when there is 2 the person has someone to back them up.
Just looked up what aggravated child abuse is defined as in Florida:
(a) Intentional infliction of physical or mental injury upon a child;
(b) An intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child; or
(c) Active encouragement of any person to commit an act that results or could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child.
A person who knowingly or willfully abuses a child without causing great bodily harm, permanent disability, or permanent disfigurement to the child commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(2) "Aggravated child abuse" occurs when a person:
(a) Commits aggravated battery on a child;
(b) Willfully tortures, maliciously punishes, or willfully and unlawfully cages a child; or
(c) Knowingly or willfully abuses a child and in so doing causes great bodily harm, permanent disability, or permanent disfigurement to the child.
So from reading that description, since they found her not guilty of murder I would only assume they couldn't find her guilty of child abuse? I also looked up the definition of child neglect in Florida:
1. A caregiver's failure or omission to provide a child with the care, supervision, and services necessary to maintain the child's physical and mental health, including, but not limited to, food, nutrition, clothing, shelter, supervision, medicine, and medical services that a prudent person would consider essential for the well-being of the child; or
2. A caregiver's failure to make a reasonable effort to protect a child from abuse, neglect, or exploitation by another person.
(a) Neglect of a child may be based on repeated conduct or on a single incident or omission that results in, or could reasonably be expected to result in, serious physical or mental injury, or a substantial risk of death, to a child.
(b) A person who willfully or by culpable negligence neglects a child and in so doing causes great bodily harm, permanent disability, or permanent disfigurement to the child commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(c) A person who willfully or by culpable negligence neglects a child without causing great bodily harm, permanent disability, or permanent disfigurement to the child commits a felony of the third
degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
So could she be charged with neglect? It's a different charge then abuse correct? If anyone has any comments regarding this situation or could provide some insight into the judicial system and why things happen the way they do I would greatly appreciate it so leave me a comment!!
-It's really important to remember that a little girl was taken way to soon from this earth and that the Anthony family... guilty or not... will forever be changed.
Alex
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)